CosmicCat
TF Ace
I already acknowledged in my original post that TDS is applicable if the CIF-level interest income exceeded the threshold (₹50,000 for senior citizens). However, that doesn’t automatically justify how SBI calculated ₹4,900 as “Tax on Previous Interest”—especially when:I am afraid, this additional information is inconsistent with the earlier claim that:
"the TDS can't be anywhere close to ₹4900 on the interest earned on his SCSS deposits for the whole financial year."
So, quite obviously, SBI's claim was correct that:
"On 01.01.2025, threshold limit was crossed."
-- so they rightly applied TDS, starting with 5k (10% of the 50k threshold).
- Form 15H was already filed for all SCSS deposits at the beginning of the financial year, which banks are supposed to honor unless proven invalid. The sole reason why Form 15H was submitted was, his total income—inclusive of the interest income earned from the bank—was less than the threshold limit set by the Income Tax Department's guidelines to avoid deduction of TDS, and that his tax liability was also zero for FY 2024-25.
- ₹70 was already deducted as TDS for this FD (10% of ₹699).
- No breakup or computation proof was provided for the ₹4,900 deduction.
Your point makes no sense at all! Actually, there’s a very clear difference—legally and financially:No, the point is, you have a very strange idea about the distinction between principal and interest. When the money is paid out on maturity (I.e. not reinvested), what's the difference? The point is, whether the (total Principal + all interest payouts) is actually more or less than the total input principal (I.e. all accounts put together, -- not at each individual account level)!
Just think, where from will the bank (any bank, not just SBI) deduct the money if the still-payable interest does not cover the deductible amount (only because more interest was paid earlier than was actually payable after TDS that was not applied at that point)?
- Principal is sacrosanct in a Fixed Deposit contract. The agreement clearly states you’ll get back your entire deposited amount + interest, unless penalized for premature withdrawal.
- Deducting anything from principal at maturity, especially without clear prior disclosure or consent, undermines the terms of the FD contract. If banks start dipping into principal to settle internal calculations, it sets a dangerous precedent, especially for fixed-income senior citizens.
- TDS should always be deducted from interest, not arbitrarily from principal—unless explicitly disclosed in terms or with consent.
Even “common sense” has to follow due process and transparency. If a shortfall exists, SBI must:This must be there in every bank's policy, and is such common sense that it doesn't need to be communicated in each individual case.
- Notify the customer, ideally before maturity or deduction,
- Provide a clear statement showing the deficit and calculations leading to that deduction,
- Explain why Form 15H wasn’t honored, despite being submitted.
This is not about whether TDS is payable or not—it's about how it was handled:
- No notice,
- No computation sheet,
- No explanation for disregarding Form 15H,
- And deduction from principal without disclosure.
Of course we’ll claim a refund. But a refund doesn’t mean the bank gets a free pass to violate process or ethics. People deserve accountability and transparency at the source, not just a patchwork remedy later.ask for a refund by filing the ITR.
Last edited: