Its address to all public who might get confused by your straight forward answer "No" while its not correct. Its yes for part and no for part. So explained the same to public viewing this thread
Its address to all public who might get confused by your straight forward answer "No" while its not correct. Its yes for part and no for part. So explained the same to public viewing this thread
I do understand ur concern.
And to ur knowledge i already know that its upto 5% and not exact 5%.
I only answered the kiwi's question in a straight forward manner, to which he is very much satisfied (conclusive from his rxns) and u must understand this.
That's good that u want to inform all the public here, but u shouldn't have quoted my post as it creates a sense of falseness .
I again quote his question here