• Hey there! Welcome to TFC! View fewer ads on the website just by signing up on TF Community.

Offer Fulfilled! Get Rs.75 off* at Amazon.in via SELECT* Visa Platinum Card

The offer has been fulfilled by the bank/company.
Apply For Lifetime Free IDFC First Credit Card
#aniket said:
Conclusion is; Mostly Card kaam nahi kar rahe, select platinum card ke category mein nahi aa raha...

View attachment 54035

So, Guys comment karye kaunsi kaunsi cards ka kata hai Visa abhi tak, exclusion list banye.... 🥲
Click to expand...
@vaibhav111 bro mark this as best answer or solution, so that other don't have to waste more time, finding which card works.

Earlier I had marked it but later when the thread got merged, it got removed.
 
_amit_ said:
Even though this does not concern me but I would try to clarify the issue as there is a clear misunderstanding of what is the concern here.

The concern is not about merging the duplicates. Even this post is merged and was a duplicate.

Using the example you gave,
I am using names from 5 star ad. Resemblance of name to any member is purely coincidental
  • ICICI devaluation post was created by Author Ramesh
  • Duplicate posts D1 ,D2, D3 ... Dn was created by Author A1, A2 .. An
  • All posts were merged under original post ICICI devaluation with author still as Ramesh (the profile pic will show Ramesh)
This is perfect. No issues here, duplicates should not be there and you guys are doing a great job.




Then what is the problem?
Based on comments from other members, the following issue has arisen, which negatively impacts contributors:
  • Ramesh created Post P. The profile picture of Ramesh is shown on Post P.
  • Suresh created a similar Post P1, which has a better description and details. The profile picture of Suresh is shown on Post P1.
  • Lets assume both posts went on for weeks
  • Since the posts are similar, they were marked duplicate, and finally merged.
  • However, this time, Ramesh, the original author, is no longer credited as the author of the merged post.
  • Instead, Suresh, who posted after Ramesh, is now shown as the author. The profile picture of Suresh appears on the merged post, not Ramesh's.
  • As a result, Ramesh feels discredited and sees his effort as wasted, while Suresh receives the credit despite posting later.
I tried to make this as easy to understand as possible and hope that there is no confusion about what is the actual issue anymore.

Some decisions are straightforward (clear duplicates, guideline were broken), and no one has an problems. However, discrediting the original author is a concern for some members.

That's why I suggested the co-author pattern earlier. If both Ramesh's and Suresh's profile pictures appeared on the post, both would feel recognized for their contributions.

Whether mods see this as an issue or not is up to them, I just felt the need to clarify because there is a clear misunderstanding about the actual issue.
Click to expand...
If Ramesh posted it at 6 AM on May 1st, and Suresh posted it at 8 AM on May 1st, and we merge both threads, Ramesh will be the thread creator as he was the earlier poster. Unless we feel that the later poster provided a better description, in which case we may manually award him the creator status (this is not a normal scenario).
 
Apply For LTF HDFC Swiggy Credit Card
TechnoFino said:
If Ramesh posted it at 6 AM on May 1st, and Suresh posted it at 8 AM on May 1st, and we merge both threads, Ramesh will be the thread creator as he was the earlier poster. Unless we feel that the later poster provided a better description, in which case we may manually award him the creator status (this is not a normal scenario).
Click to expand...
Really, such rule exists?

If so, I have provided info in detail but.. 🙂
 
_amit_ said:
Even though this does not concern me but I would try to clarify the issue as there is a clear misunderstanding of what is the concern here.

The concern is not about merging the duplicates. Even this post is merged and was a duplicate.

Using the example you gave,
I am using names from 5 star ad. Resemblance of name to any member is purely coincidental
  • ICICI devaluation post was created by Author Ramesh
  • Duplicate posts D1 ,D2, D3 ... Dn was created by Author A1, A2 .. An
  • All posts were merged under original post ICICI devaluation with author still as Ramesh (the profile pic will show Ramesh)
This is perfect. No issues here, duplicates should not be there and you guys are doing a great job.




Then what is the problem?
Based on comments from other members, the following issue has arisen, which negatively impacts contributors:
  • Ramesh created Post P. The profile picture of Ramesh is shown on Post P.
  • Suresh created a similar Post P1, which has a better description and details. The profile picture of Suresh is shown on Post P1.
  • Lets assume both posts went on for weeks
  • Since the posts are similar, they were marked duplicate, and finally merged.
  • However, this time, Ramesh, the original author, is no longer credited as the author of the merged post.
  • Instead, Suresh, who posted after Ramesh, is now shown as the author. The profile picture of Suresh appears on the merged post, not Ramesh's.
  • As a result, Ramesh feels discredited and sees his effort as wasted, while Suresh receives the credit despite posting later.
I tried to make this as easy to understand as possible and hope that there is no confusion about what is the actual issue anymore.

Some decisions are straightforward (clear duplicates, guideline were broken), and no one has an problems. However, discrediting the original author is a concern for some members.

That's why I suggested the co-author pattern earlier. If both Ramesh's and Suresh's profile pictures appeared on the post, both would feel recognized for their contributions.

Whether mods see this as an issue or not is up to them, I just felt the need to clarify because there is a clear misunderstanding about the actual issue.
Click to expand...
Yeh cat ka LR section hai
Yeh toh A5 sheet me visualise v nhi hoga

@Slayer 🤣🤣
 
_amit_ said:
Ye sab @#aniket ka lafda hai.
Click to expand...
Lafda already explained kar diya tha aap jab topic chede the lekin usko aap ignore kar diye...
_amit_ said:
Me to aajkal sirf rumaal rakhane aata hu kyuki jaha @#aniket aa jaaye comment section me waha dange ho hi jaate hai.
Click to expand...
Matalab kuch bhi ho ans na mile toh reason Aniket, huh?😂
FvwdGp2aQAIvmW4_1.jpg
Jake mera comments kis kis thread pe hai dekh lijye aur uske baad batiye kaha kaha lafda ho gaya...
Ye toh ab kuch jada hi ho raha...galat koi aur ho aur tana kisi aur ko mara jaye...
_amit_ said:
Mere rumaal ki saari ban gayi hai is chakkar me.
Click to expand...
Acha hai na kaam aayega aapko 💀
 
Last edited:
#aniket said:
Lafda already explained kar diya tha aap jab topic chede the lekin usko aap ignore kar diye...

Matalab kuch bhi ho ans na mile toh reason Aniket, huh?😂

Jake mera comments kis kis thread pe hai dekh lijye aur uske baad batiye kaha kaha lafda ho gaya...
Ye toh ab kuch jada hi ho raha...galat koi aur ho aur tana kisi aur ko mara jaye...
View attachment 54213

Acha hai na kaam aayega aapko 💀
Click to expand...
I was just kidding.

You don't need to explain anything to anyone.

By explaining you broke the suspense.
I was hoping to make you a guy who created riot but no ones knows why, and everyone keeps talking about it.

Pinki ko to neend bhi nahi aayi thi us din.
 
_amit_ said:
I was just kidding.

You don't need to explain anything to anyone.
Click to expand...
Yes, I don't need. Though explained to you thinking you don't know what happened, as you stated enquiring the same.
_amit_ said:
By explaining you broke the suspense.
Click to expand...
Haha, I don't want it either.
_amit_ said:
I was hoping to make you a guy who created riot
Click to expand...
Ohh WoW 😂 Riot 🙀
_amit_ said:
but no ones knows why, and everyone keeps talking about it.
Click to expand...
Everyone includes???

Logo ka kaam hai bolna...I don't care.
_amit_ said:
Pinki ko to neend bhi nahi aayi thi us din.
Click to expand...
Matalab discussion kahi aur bhi chalta hai aur chal raha tha...
 
Last edited:
pinki said:
I am a victim of ur Ramesh Suresh example coz same thing has happened with me earlier on TF 😉🙃
Click to expand...
I too tried to explain that to vaibhav but he didn't got what i was trying to convey at that time.

Once u put up that example. Everything was clear to him.

Great efforts though! Appreciable ! 👍

Kyuki mere se itna nhi likha jata 🥴
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top