I think the only point I want to focus here is this -
@SSV @Riva I agree that there are other major potential privacy leaks with SMS and emails. But would you agree that knowing the credit limit of a user makes a scammer more likely to target them? If yes, it could be considered to keep it protected
by default. Advanced users can choose to display it if they want, like Riva pointed out the control on Android.
---
Consider the case of banks immediately informing the available CL after each transaction via SMS. It is their duty inform you .. if they don’t , people go and say I was not aware my current CL and it’s banks fault for not informing
I understand and agree with this statement. It seems like a double edged sword.
On the matter of apps reading SMS and email info - yes, that is a concern for privacy. Amazon has stopped giving order details in emails in some countries, because they know Google/Gmail can read it and target users with relevant ads.
---
There is NO law in India that states that banking apps should not be allowed to take a screenshot. It's a guideline to prevent misuse and fraud and hence implemented.
RBI is authorised to monitor banks under the Act of 1949. That means RBI is allowed to make guidelines and enforce the banks to follow it. I can't recall if RBI has a guideline for taking screenshots. I stated it as an example, there are many other mandatory guidelines.
---
To put it blunty,
In Inida, there is no meaning for these two:
1)Customer sevice
2) Protecting privacy
Any rule makes sense when everyone ( at least a majority) recognises it and follows it in any society..
I am not going to waste my precious time on this topic...
If you can forgive me for saying this, I think this is a cynical attitude. If banking and CC enthusiasts like all of us here think like that, there would be no changes or improvements in the banking system. We write to RBI Ombudsmen because we remain hopeful that a corrective action shall be taken. Right?
Banking is such a deeply technical + securely protected system that general public gets to know about the frauds when it happens ALL around us. RBI can't wait for public to object to make such regulations.
You remember we discussed the cheque fraud case? It was a surprise for a majority of us in the forum. People can't object what they don't know OR haven't suffered themselves. Does that mean it should be ignored by RBI?
The general public is noob/newbie/unaware of the potential banking scams. RBI has to handhold them, as it has been doing for several decades now.
--
Yes, there are other major flaws to be improved. But that doesn't undermine the other tiny things that could be a potential security breach.
I'm not expecting any replies here, based on the last few comments. We can have different opinions on this topic.