• Hey there! Welcome to TFC! View fewer ads on the website just by signing up on TF Community.

Issue Resolved Rupay Platinum DC: Is the Amazon Friday 20% Off Offer Still On?

The highlighted issue has been resolved by the bank/financial institution.
Ha toh private company he hai. RTI karo jisko doubt ho.

RTI me likh dena ki agar answer not-for-profit company hai toh usme bhi baaye ki private not-for-profit company hai ya govt not-for-profit company ha ya kuch aur.
Mein aapko 1,000 pay karunga if private co. raha toh aap karoge 1,000 pay if nahi raha toh ?

Sart hi laga lete hain bro itna confident hain toh...aap bhi boliye jada amount ka lagana ho toh...

Not for profit mat hi laaye isme, apne baat pe tike rahiye, change mat karye...pvt ya non government bol rahe the aap pehle, na ki not for profit
 
Last edited:
NPCI is a non-govt company.

Koi doubt hai toh RTI file karlo. Rs10 lagega bas.
🤣🤣

Faltu k hamesa k behas waji se chutkara mil jayega sab ko. Waise toh mujhe RTI k answer pe bhi bharosa nahi hota hai, dekhe ho na bank kc ards k bare me misinfo ya half info dete hai woh log.


The govt never provides any funds or incentives to NPCI.

The incentives in the govt's budget are meant for banks, not NPCI.

NPCI itself is a profitable company and its profits are increasing every year. That’s why it is gradually launching so many premium cards.

In fact, this Amazon Friday offer has been running even before the govt's digital incentives
RTI is baat ki file kro ki why SBI does not post new debit cards and accounts on it websites.
It should post all info.
 
Mein aapko 1,000 pay karunga if private co. raha toh aap karoge 1,000 pay if nahi raha toh ?

Sart hi laga lete hain bro itna confident hain toh...aap bhi boliye jada amount ka lagana ho toh...

Not for profit mat hi laaye isme, apne baat pe tike rahiye, change mat karye...pvt ya non government bol rahe the aap pehle, na ki not for profit
Jo harega wo mera ek saal ka mob recharge karayega 😉
 
Mein aapko 1,000 pay karunga if private co. raha toh aap karoge 1,000 pay if nahi raha toh ?

Sart hi laga lete hain bro itna confident hain toh...aap bhi boliye jada amount ka lagana ho toh...

Not for profit mat hi laaye isme, apne baat pe tike rahiye, change mat karye...pvt ya non government bol rahe the aap pehle, na ki not for profit
Gambling karna achi baat nahi hai.
 
Are bhai, @Aniket @Abhishek012 Keu be waja lad rahe ho. Kya fark padta hay ye pvt. ltd. ho ya public ltd ya LLP ya partnership ya fer a holding co, yato fully owned subsidiary of a holding co... Fer uska v structure dhundne baith jaoge aap dono. Hume usse kya lena dena?

Hume toh baas cashback se matlab hay. Kya pata RTI karte karte company apna ownership structure hi badal de. Tav aap dono kya karoge?
 
Mein aapko 1,000 pay karunga if private co. raha toh aap karoge 1,000 pay if nahi raha toh ?

Sart hi laga lete hain bro itna confident hain toh...aap bhi boliye jada amount ka lagana ho toh...

Not for profit mat hi laaye isme, apne baat pe tike rahiye, change mat karye...pvt ya non government bol rahe the aap pehle, na ki not for profit
Bhai aap private company chodiye aur rupay select lijiye. But 1 get 1 free 😉.

https://www.technofino.in/community...fyf-union-bank-rupay-select-debit-card.38189/
 
Are bhai, @Aniket @Abhishek012 Keu be waja lad rahe ho. Kya fark padta hay ye pvt. ltd. ho ya public ltd ya LLP ya partnership ya fer a holding co, yato fully owned subsidiary of a holding co... Fer uska v structure dhundne baith jaoge aap dono. Hume usse kya lena dena?

Hume toh baas cashback se matlab hay. Kya pata RTI karte karte company apna ownership structure hi badal de. Tav aap dono kya karoge?
Lad nahi rahe hain dono chill hain kyu @Abhishek012 bro theek kaha na?

Bas laga galt chiz ka raita faila huwa hai, mis information theek nahi hota na, wahi chiz dusre log bina dimag lagaye sahi maan lete hain, and wahi maan ke ek memb ne comment kiya tha...

RTI file karne ka jarurat hi nahi hai mujhe pata pura...🙂

Structure bhi nahi badal sakta inta easy bhi nahi hai, pvt se public hone jitna aashan nahi hai

Haan Cashback/benefits se hi matalab hai 🤭

Let it be 😜
 
@Abhishek012 @Aniket bhaiyo ye ladayi court mai already ho chuki hai


File No: CIC/MOFIN/C/2017/131504/BKOBD

Quoting the judgement of the bench (emphasis mine) (attaching the original) (Link to alternate copyGet Premium Link):

The Commission after adverting to the facts and circumstances of the case, hearing both the parties and perusal of records, observes that the complainant had not filed second appeal aggrieved by non receipt of information/reply in response to his RTI application and first appeal before approaching this commission by way of complaint. It may not be unreasonable for NPCI to consider itself not covered within the meaning of public authority under RTI. However keeping in view of the above facts, it may not be proper for this Commission, on a complaint, to include within the ambit of public authority what was not intended explicitly by the legislature. Not declared as public authority NPCI might not be under an obligation to disclose the information requested for by the complainant nor maintain a list of CPIOs as mandated by the RTI Act. Commission is also of the view that it may be open to the complainant to seek information through public authority for NPCI i.e. RBI or Ministry of Finance as the case may be. That being so, the complaint of the complainant is unfounded and the same is rejected.

This means that even the highest authority of RTI i.e. Central Information Commission (CIC) acknowledges that it SHOULD be a public authority but it is not so explicitly (by lack of legislature) and CCI's judges cannot convert it to one based on this one complaint. (Matters related to legislation are often left to SC).

So @Abhishek012 is correct that NPCI is not covered under the RTI Act. atleast for now, which indirectly means NPCI is not a govt. entity, as argued by NPCI itself.

DISCLAIMER: I am not a lawyer.
 

Attachments

@Abhishek012 @Aniket bhaiyo ye ladayi court mai already ho chuki hai


File No: CIC/MOFIN/C/2017/131504/BKOBD

Quoting the judgement of the bench (emphasis mine) (attaching the original) (Link to alternate copyGet Premium Link):



This means that even the highest authority of RTI i.e. Central Information Commission (CIC) acknowledges that it SHOULD be a public authority but it is not so explicitly (by lack of legislature) and CCI's judges cannot convert it to one based on this one complaint. (Matters related to legislation are often left to SC).

So @Abhishek012 is correct that NPCI is not covered under the RTI Act. atleast for now, which indirectly means NPCI is not a govt. entity, as argued by NPCI itself.

DISCLAIMER: I am not a lawyer.
He was correct how? The one who said ask the answer through RTI ?

& When I have argued about being gov co? 🤣 I have argued that NPCI is not a private co, whereas Abhishek bro is mentioning everywhere that it's a private co.

Matalab kuch bhi ho raha hai yaha pe 🤣

Aasaan bhasa mein ans dete hoon pata nahi complex mein kya ho so...see private limited/ pvt. ltd. NPCI(National Payments Corporation of India) ke name mein use nahi huwa hai and hence it's evident that it's not a private co. The profit that NPCI earns, can not distribute among its members, rather it spends to promote it object(s) only.

Edit: The matter whether it's covered under RTI or not is big. Commision was not able to rule out properly based on their arguments and facts presented thats all and suggested to seek info about the same from RBI, Finance Ministry, mentioned there. SC interpretation will carry more validity in this case whether to consider it as public authority or not under RTI Act.

Also, NPCI can/is indirectly controlled by gov through PSU banks which hold/own majority of shares in NPCI. Not only that substantially funded as well (refer budget brought by GoI).
 
Last edited:
@Abhishek012 @Aniket bhaiyo ye ladayi court mai already ho chuki hai


File No: CIC/MOFIN/C/2017/131504/BKOBD

Quoting the judgement of the bench (emphasis mine) (attaching the original) (Link to alternate copyGet Premium Link):



This means that even the highest authority of RTI i.e. Central Information Commission (CIC) acknowledges that it SHOULD be a public authority but it is not so explicitly (by lack of legislature) and CCI's judges cannot convert it to one based on this one complaint. (Matters related to legislation are often left to SC).

So @Abhishek012 is correct that NPCI is not covered under the RTI Act. atleast for now, which indirectly means NPCI is not a govt. entity, as argued by NPCI itself.

DISCLAIMER: I am not a lawyer.
Ya, how many times have I said this. It's not just about NPCI.

All card network companies in the world, across different countries (I mean, okay, I haven’t checked all 200 countries, but I can confidently say this about at least 15-20 popular card network companies), are private.

Even Visa and Mastercard, despite being backed by the US govt and initially starting as non-profit organizations, later became "for-profit" and publicly listed companies. But even after being backed by the US govt, Visa and Mastercard remain private companies.

When NPCI was created, it was built by completely following Visa/Mastercard’s business model.
 
Back
Top