Dear Hyperbeast,
I apologize for the confusion caused in the specific regards, with reference to ITR in specific.
I have committed an error in framing my sentence, which is different than what I wanted to convey to you all.
The fact which I was trying to portray was that my wife is a home maker, so ideally she doesn't file an ITR.
But I have linked her PAN with a Demat Account which I use for investing in stocks and MF's so as to avail tax benefits under 7L inc and other claims.
But even if I were to show that as an income proof solely to get Magnus, would have been starightaway rejected, so applied under C2C, mentioning the correct income obtained under her PAN records but didn't provide any evidence like ITR/Computation or B/S to cross check the same.
The sole purpose not to use my PAN for investing is to save tax, that's all.
I hope you've understood why I made a mistake in choosing the right combination of words, and miscommunicated the facts.
I further hope I made myself clear and made the confusion clear from my side.