• Hey there! Welcome to TFC! View fewer ads on the website just by signing up on TF Community.

ICICI Bank Is Not Following RBI Guidelines | What Is the RBI Doing?

TechnoFinoTechnoFino is verified member.

Founder
TF Family
Founder
Admin
As expected from ICICI Bank, I found that they are not following a particular RBI guideline. Recently, I was looking at my ICICI Bank Emeralde Private Metal Credit Card statement and noticed a problem.

The problem:
The RBI directed all credit card issuers in India to follow this guideline:
"v. ... Late payment charges and other related charges shall be levied only on the outstanding amount after the due date, and not on the total amount due.
vi. Interest shall be levied only on the outstanding amount, adjusted for payments/refunds/reversed transactions."

*Check Master Direction – Credit Card and Debit Card – Issuance and Conduct Directions, 2022 (Updated as on March 07, 2024) Point No 9. (b). v. and vi.

This simply means: If you make a partial payment on your credit card bill before the due date, the bank can only charge interest and late fees on the remaining amount, not on the basis of the original total amount due.

Example:
Sujit has an ICICI Bank credit card with a bill of Rs. 50,000 due on May 28, 2024. He pays Rs. 30,000 on May 25, 2024. ICICI Bank can only charge late fees and interest on the remaining Rs. 20,000 after the due date plus a 3-day grace period, not on the full Rs. 50,000.

Now, when I check my ICICI Bank Emeralde Private Metal Card statement, I found that they have written:
"Interest will be charged if the Total Amount Due (TAD) is not paid by the payment due date. Interest will be charged on the Total Amount Due and on all new transactions except fees/charges and GST/taxes (from the transaction date) until such time as the previous outstanding amounts are paid in full. In addition, interest will be levied on all cash advances from the date of the transaction until the date of payment."

This indicates that ICICI Bank is not adhering to the RBI guidelines.

Screenshot 2024-05-27 at 11.56.54 PM.png
Now, I was like, wow! ICICI Bank is still using old text and not bothering to change it even after the RBI instructed all banks to do so. I know... ICICI Bank only changes the MITC and other terms after someone files a complaint against them. 😄

Jokes apart, I decided to check other banks' statements to compare their practices. So, I checked my HDFC Infinia, IDFC First Wealth, Yes Private, Axis Atlas, SBI Cashback, and a few other card statements and found that they are following the RBI guidelines.

For example, I'm attaching a screenshot of the Yes Private credit card statement:

Screenshot_20240527_233751_Drive.jpg

They have clearly mentioned that interest will be charged on the remaining due amount (outstanding balance) and not on the total due amount.

Now, whom should we blame here? ICICI Bank for not following the RBI guidelines, or the RBI for not carefully checking if all the banks are following their guidelines?
Post your opinion here.

Update (On 4th June, 2024):

Today, two ICICI Bank credit card product managers called me to discuss the issue I highlighted on TFC and Twitter on 28th May, 2024, regarding interest charges on the total amount due.

According to them, ICICI Bank is fully complying with the latest RBI guidelines. They pointed out that as per point 9.b.iii of the "Master Direction – Credit Card and Debit Card – Issuance and Conduct Directions, 2022 (Updated as on March 07, 2024)," ".... The MITC shall specifically explain that the interest-free credit period is suspended if any balance of the previous month's bill is outstanding." This is interlinked with the point I highlighted, 9.b.vi: "Interest shall be levied only on the outstanding amount, adjusted for payments/refunds/reversed transactions."

As per their explanation, if a customer does not make full payment, they lose the interest-free credit period benefit, and the bank can charge interest from the day of the transaction. Since the interest-free period is lost, the bank will charge interest on the entire billed amount, not just the remaining due amount.

I tried to explain that the RBI has directed that the 'interest-free credit period' is suspended if any balance of the previous month's bill is outstanding. This means if a customer does not make full payment this month, they will not get any interest-free credit card period on the remaining due amount from the date of the transaction and on any future transactions until they repay all the remaining due balance from the last statement.

However, the two product managers were confident that they were fully complying with the RBI guidelines. I then requested them to look at other banks' statements and why other banks use the term "interest will be charged on balance outstanding amount including any new purchases and cash advances," but unfortunately, the product managers were not convinced by my argument. I finally suggested that they re-examine the matter and also review other banks' credit card statements if possible.

After this call, when I checked the RBI master direction again, I found another supporting point for my argument. Please refer to Query 6 of the "Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) of Master Direction (MD) - Credit Card and Debit Card – Issuance and Conduct Directions, 2022":

"Query 6: In case a cardholder makes partial payment, can a card issuer charge interest/levy late payment charges on the total amount due?"

"Response: In case a cardholder does not clear the total amount due within the payment due date, the interest-free credit period will be lost, and interest may be levied from the date of the transaction on the outstanding amount (adjusted for payments/refunds/reversed transactions as and when credited) and not on the total amount due. Further, late payment fees and other charges relating to delay in payment shall be levied only on the outstanding amount (adjusted for payments/refunds/reversed transactions as and when credited) after the payment due date and not on the total amount due."

From the above-mentioned FAQ, it is clear that banks should charge interest on the remaining due balance and not on the total due balance. I do not understand how a major bank like ICICI could misinterpret the RBI's guidelines. I suggest that ICICI Bank review this matter to ensure they are not making any errors.

As I always recommend, please conduct your own research before believing anything, even if the statement comes from a top bank official. Do not blindly trust bank employees; be an informed customer.

A cautionary note for all ICICI Bank credit card users: Please do not make part payments, as they will charge you interest on your total due amount, including the amount you have already paid and the remaining due.
If any bank charges you interest on your total due amount even after a partial payment, file a complaint with the RBI Banking Ombudsman.
 
Last edited:
Now, whom should we blame here? ICICI Bank for not following the RBI guidelines, or the RBI for not carefully checking if all the banks are following their guidelines?
Let me share another case where your questions hold merit.

I am dealing with a case of a fraudulent cheque issued in the name of my neighbour (I've made a post if anybody wishes to read).

In this case, RBI has issued clear guidelines to ID verify an individual for cashing of a bearer's cheque > Rs 50,000. PNB remains adamant that it is just a guideline and not a mandate. So, they do an ID verification for cheques > 2 Lakhs.

Who is at blame here? PNB refusing to follow the ideal guidelines, or RBI issuing "guidelines" instead of "mandates" in the first place?!

To me the answer is both entities could be blamed. So, I've written an Ombudsman complaint to RBI, to give them an opportunity and make PNB enforce this guideline (and hopefully, reimburse my neighbour).
 
As expected from ICICI Bank, I found that they are not following a particular RBI guideline. Recently, I was looking at my ICICI Bank Emeralde Private Metal Credit Card statement and noticed a problem.

The problem:
The RBI directed all credit card issuers in India to follow this guideline:
"v. ... Late payment charges and other related charges shall be levied only on the outstanding amount after the due date, and not on the total amount due.
vi. Interest shall be levied only on the outstanding amount, adjusted for payments/refunds/reversed transactions."

*Check Master Direction – Credit Card and Debit Card – Issuance and Conduct Directions, 2022 (Updated as on March 07, 2024) Point No 9. (b). v. and vi.

This simply means: If you make a partial payment on your credit card bill before the due date, the bank can only charge interest and late fees on the remaining amount, not on the basis of the original total amount due.

Example:
Sujit has an ICICI Bank credit card with a bill of Rs. 50,000 due on May 28, 2024. He pays Rs. 30,000 on May 25, 2024. ICICI Bank can only charge late fees and interest on the remaining Rs. 20,000 after the due date plus a 3-day grace period, not on the full Rs. 50,000.

Now, when I check my ICICI Bank Emeralde Private Metal Card statement, I found that they have written:
"Interest will be charged if the Total Amount Due (TAD) is not paid by the payment due date. Interest will be charged on the Total Amount Due and on all new transactions except fees/charges and GST/taxes (from the transaction date) until such time as the previous outstanding amounts are paid in full. In addition, interest will be levied on all cash advances from the date of the transaction until the date of payment."

This indicates that ICICI Bank is not adhering to the RBI guidelines.

View attachment 55189
Now, I was like, wow! ICICI Bank is still using old text and not bothering to change it even after the RBI instructed all banks to do so. I know... ICICI Bank only changes the MITC and other terms after someone files a complaint against them. 😄

Jokes apart, I decided to check other banks' statements to compare their practices. So, I checked my HDFC Infinia, IDFC First Wealth, Yes Private, Axis Atlas, SBI Cashback, and a few other card statements and found that they are following the RBI guidelines.

For example, I'm attaching a screenshot of the Yes Private credit card statement:

View attachment 55190

They have clearly mentioned that interest will be charged on the remaining due amount (outstanding balance) and not on the total due amount.

The RBI also asked all card issuers to include a warning message on their card statements informing customers about the repercussions of paying only the minimum amount due. According to Point No. 9(b).III. of the Master Direction – Credit Card and Debit Card – Issuance and Conduct Directions, 2022 (Updated as of March 07, 2024):

"iii. Card-issuers shall inform the cardholders of the implications of paying only 'the minimum amount due'. A legend/warning to the effect that 'Making only the minimum payment every month would result in the repayment stretching over months/years with consequential compounded interest payment on your outstanding balance' shall be prominently displayed in all the billing statements to caution the cardholders about the pitfalls in paying only the minimum amount due. The MITC shall specifically explain that the 'interest-free credit period' is suspended if any balance of the previous month's bill is outstanding."

However, I couldn't find this warning anywhere in my ICICI Bank Emeralde Private Metal Credit Card statement. When I checked other bank statements, like IDFC First, Yes Bank, and Axis Bank, I found they had included the warning message. Surprisingly, HDFC Bank also did not add the warning message.

Now, whom should we blame here? ICICI Bank for not following the RBI guidelines, or the RBI for not carefully checking if all the banks are following their guidelines?
Post your opinion here.

That is why i had long back suggested a RBI guidelines compliance officer.
The salient features of this officer :

1) Hired by the Bank with bank's money
2) Report to the RBI directly, not to the Bank management
3) Main Job of this person, Make sure the Bank is enforcing the all the RBI guidelines which were issued in the interest of customers
4) Take all complaints from customers with regard to any issues relating to RBI guidelines which wee issued to protect customer's rights.
5) Periodically report to the RBI ( like monthly, quarterly, yearly ) about the guidelines enforcement, highlight the issues. and also recommend any modifications.


How is my proposal..?

React to my message if in agreement...

I discussed this one of the thread more than 10 months ago... in this thread..

 
Last edited:
That is why i had long back suggested a RBI guidelines compliance officer.
The salient features of this officer :
There's a post of internal Banking Ombudsman at many major banks. Isn't that post designed for the same?
 
How will RBI knows if any bank has been following these specific rules unless a card customer complains to RBI. Writing some texts on a website, which has not been updated, couldnt be taken as "breaking rbi rules".

Is not like rbi have a research division where the staff have all the cards of indian banks and they keep both eyes on things, is it ? Haha.
 
There's a post of internal Banking Ombudsman at many major banks. Isn't that post designed for the same?
Does this guy takes any complaints from the customers directly? If so this has to be publicised widely to the customers..

My proposed officer should be specifically designated to address " guidelines issued by the RBI favoring customers or in the interests of customers" only...
 
Last edited:
That is why i had long back suggested a RBI guidelines compliance officer.
The salient features of this officer :

1) Hired by the Bank with bank's money
2) Report to the RBI directly, not to the Bank management
3) Main Job of this person, Make sure the Bank is enforcing the all the RBI guidelines which were issued in the interest of customers
4) Take all complaints from customers with regard to any issues relating to RBI guidelines which wee issued to protect customer's rights.
5) Periodically report to the RBI ( like monthly, quarterly, yearly ) about the guidelines enforcement, highlight the issues. and also recommend any modifications.


How is my proposal..?

React to my message if in agreement...

I discussed this one of the thread more than 6 months ago..
this was my previous post... posted in July 2023...


1716839836678.png


1716839884634.png
 
That is why i had long back suggested a RBI guidelines compliance officer.
The salient features of this officer :

1) Hired by the Bank with bank's money
2) Report to the RBI directly, not to the Bank management
3) Main Job of this person, Make sure the Bank is enforcing the all the RBI guidelines which were issued in the interest of customers
4) Take all complaints from customers with regard to any issues relating to RBI guidelines which wee issued to protect customer's rights.
5) Periodically report to the RBI ( like monthly, quarterly, yearly ) about the guidelines enforcement, highlight the issues. and also recommend any modifications.


How is my proposal..?

React to my message if in agreement...

I discussed this one of the thread more than 6 months ago..

I know such a position/post/person is already in operation in many major banks. One of my ex-SBI-bosses (a GM cadre guy) was engaged by ICICI for such a post - on a 2 year contract - about 3 years back.
 
I know such a position/post/person is already in operation in many major banks. One of my ex-SBI-bosses (a GM cadre guy) was engaged by ICICI for such a post - on a 2 year contract - about 3 years back.
Does this person take complaints directly from the customers?
if so, how may customers are aware of this position..
He / his office should be accessible to the customers , because he is representing the cusotmers , NOT the Bank...

If someone is sitting behind and noone knows about him / her doesn't cut the cake...

and most importantly this person should not report to the BANK's management..
He/ she should directly report to the RBI..
and why he was hired on contract basis? should be on premanent basis.. and should have a team of small group of people under him...

This should not be a mere eye wash gesture...

The Banks will show massive enthusiam in implementing any guidelines issued by the RBI if those guidelines protect the intersets of the BANKs..
Where as if it is the opposite case , then they resort to these mere eye-wash response / measures...
Pathetic...

what is the point of having this governance model,when the main participants themselves ignore and don't follow them .. waste of time for everyone involved..
 
Last edited:
Does this person take complaints directly from the customers?
if so, how may customers are aware of this position..
He / his office should be accessible to the customers , because he is representing the cusotmers , NOT the Bank...

If someone is sitting behind and noone knows about him / her doesn't cut the cake...

and most importantly this person should not report to the BANK's management..
He/ she should directly report to the RBI..
and why he was hired on contract basis? should be on premanent basis.. and should have a team of small group of people under him...

This should not be a mere eye wash gesture...

The Banks will show massive enthusiam in implementing any guidelines issued by the RBI if those guidelines protect the intersets of the BANKs..
Where as if it is the opposite case , then they resort to these mere eye-wash response / measures...
Pathetic...

what is the point of having this governance model,when the main participants themselves ignore and don't follow them .. waste of time for everyone involved..

3 years back - I was extremely busy with my own Company's operations n the related travelling. And, I was not interested in knowing anything new developing in banking sector - like answers to all such questions. Only since last Aug23, I am having some time to know about developments in banking sector.

Most probably, you will find details of such post/person/position in the bank's main website - in the complaints section / escalation matrix.
 
Does this person take complaints directly from the customers?
if so, how may customers are aware of this position..
He / his office should be accessible to the customers , because he is representing the cusotmers , NOT the Bank...

If someone is sitting behind and noone knows about him / her doesn't cut the cake...

and most importantly this person should not report to the BANK's management..
He/ she should directly report to the RBI..
and why he was hired on contract basis? should be on premanent basis.. and should have a team of small group of people under him...

This should not be a mere eye wash gesture...

The Banks will show massive enthusiam in implementing any guidelines issued by the RBI if those guidelines protect the intersets of the BANKs..
Where as if it is the opposite case , then they resort to these mere eye-wash response / measures...
Pathetic...

what is the point of having this governance model,when the main participants themselves ignore and don't follow them .. waste of time for everyone involved..
but does one man suffice the job?, I think if they take direct complains from customer soon enough it will be a second rated customer care where nothing falls in order, RBI guidelines enforcer cannot take a complaint directly from each and every customer, they simply cannot function, rather they will have to work like a consortium. Just my 2 cents @SSV sir
 
  • Like
Reactions: SSV
3 years back - I was extremely busy with my own Company's operations n the related travelling. And, I was not interested in knowing anything new developing in banking sector - like answers to all such questions. Only since last Aug23, I am having some time to know about developments in banking sector.

Most probably, you will find details of such post/person/position in the bank's main website - in the complaints section / escalation matrix.
There is no point in discussing this because you are not aware of what happened in the past 3 years..
Lets leave it there.
 
but does one man suffice the job?, I think if they take direct complains from customer soon enough it will be a second rated customer care where nothing falls in order, RBI guidelines enforcer cannot take a complaint directly from each and every customer, they simply cannot function, rather they will have to work like a consortium. Just my 2 cents @SSV sir
Does this person take complaints directly from the customers?
if so, how may customers are aware of this position..
He / his office should be accessible to the customers , because he is representing the cusotmers , NOT the Bank...

If someone is sitting behind and noone knows about him / her doesn't cut the cake...

and most importantly this person should not report to the BANK's management..
He/ she should directly report to the RBI..
and why he was hired on contract basis? should be on premanent basis.. and should have a team of small group of people under him...

This should not be a mere eye wash gesture...
nee
The Banks will show massive enthusiam in implementing any guidelines issued by the RBI if those guidelines protect the intersets of the BANKs..
Where as if it is the opposite case , then they resort to these mere eye-wash response / measures...
Pathetic...

what is the point of having this governance model,when the main participants themselves ignore and don't follow them .. waste of time for everyone involved..

here the officer implies: office under that officer.. depending upon the size of the bank.. and size of customer base..

THe key point here everyone missing out in the conversation till now:

This specific officer/ office looks at the compliance of RBI guildeline issued in the interest of customers...
this is not a generic complaince job about everything about RBI rules..
It is very specific.. Instead of talking about this , everyone is talking about everything in generic...

If we talk about generic compliance officer , then these customer centric guideline will be kept under the carpet .. and nthing happens..
Hear need to highlight the need of the hour. i.e. guidelines that facilitate cusomters' issues...
 
Last edited:
I doubt about biasness.
when the person reports to the RBI, no biases will be there... afterall , this comes out of the compliance budget of the bank..
If there is any issue, RBI can take action like what they did against Paytm.. recently.. if they can really dare to...

otherwise what happens.. RBI issues guideline, and no bank gives a sh*t to that guideline.. what does that mean...???
Paytm did similar thing , even thought it is a different kind of compliance..., what happened to them?? why can't RBI do the samething to big banks, like penalising them in several tens of crores?? ( this doens;t warrant license ban though)..
If that happens, do the Banks care about the salary they pay to this team??
 
Last edited:
I would like to share something similar

So, in last August 2023 my statement for AU was generated and I paid the due amount in grace period but I couldn't pay 8k in the grace period because when I making the final payment of remaining 8k from my axis bank I got to know my account was frozen by axis bank.

So out of the total due amount 8k was remaining and rest was all paid in the grace period but AU bank charged me interest on the whole amount not the amount remaining.

Does the same rule also apply here as the dues were cleared in grace period and not before or on the due date.

I tired with AU bank multiple times but for them no such rule exists & there own T&C matters. I raised the same with Ombudsman but from there also AU bank replied the same thing maybe RBI doesn't read the reply and just close the case or I failed to explain my query.
 
I would like to share something similar

So, in last August 2023 my statement for AU was generated and I paid the due amount in grace period but I couldn't pay 8k in the grace period because when I making the final payment of remaining 8k from my axis bank I got to know my account was frozen by axis bank.

So out of the total due amount 8k was remaining and rest was all paid in the grace period but AU bank charged me interest on the whole amount not the amount remaining.

Does the same rule also apply here as the dues were cleared in grace period and not before or on the due date.

I tired with AU bank multiple times but for them no such rule exists & there own T&C matters. I raised the same with Ombudsman but from there also AU bank replied the same thing maybe RBI doesn't read the reply and just close the case or I failed to explain my query.
Forget about RBI rules.
You got a bill. It says pay full by due date or a minimum by due date. By that due date, payment - even minimum amount - was not paid. You paid some amount - during the grace period. So, technically speaking, you did not pay even 1 rupee before/on the due date. AU is right in applying interest.

You had a chance - only - if you had paid the minimum amount payable BEFORE the due date (and not after it).

Paying during grace period is NOT equal to paying before the given due date.

Hope you understood the difference.
 
Forget about RBI rules.
You got a bill. It says pay full by due date or a minimum by due date. By that due date, payment - even minimum amount - was not paid. You paid some amount - during the grace period. So, technically speaking, you did not pay even 1 rupee before/on the due date. AU is right in applying interest.

You had a chance - only - if you had paid the minimum amount payable BEFORE the due date (and not after it).

Paying during grace period is NOT equal to paying before the given due date.

Hope you understood the difference.
Okay got I understand.

Similar things happened in axis, I got bill in march I paid 80-90% of that bill instantly and kept some amount remaining thought I would pay later but then completely forgot about it and remembered on last day of grace period. Paid the amount but it didn't credit instantly rather It got credited next day.


And in next month statement axis charged me full interest. After asking them nicely & giving proof that I had made the payment within the grace period they did reverse the interest but they were on board with RBI rule and would have charged full Internet.

This happened in April 2024
 
The RBI also asked all card issuers to include a warning message on their card statements informing customers about the repercussions of paying only the minimum amount due. According to Point No. 9(b).III. of the Master Direction – Credit Card and Debit Card – Issuance and Conduct Directions, 2022 (Updated as of March 07, 2024):

"iii. Card-issuers shall inform the cardholders of the implications of paying only 'the minimum amount due'. A legend/warning to the effect that 'Making only the minimum payment every month would result in the repayment stretching over months/years with consequential compounded interest payment on your outstanding balance' shall be prominently displayed in all the billing statements to caution the cardholders about the pitfalls in paying only the minimum amount due. The MITC shall specifically explain that the 'interest-free credit period' is suspended if any balance of the previous month's bill is outstanding."

However, I couldn't find this warning anywhere in my ICICI Bank Emeralde Private Metal Credit Card statement.

For me, ICICI does have this warning under "IMPORTANT MESSAGES" in my statement! Whether it was displayed prominently enough or not, can be argued.

Making only minimum payment every month can lead to repayment stretching over years with consequent interest payment on
outstanding balance.
 
here the officer implies: office under that officer.. depending upon the size of the bank.. and size of customer base..
I got your point that RBI guidelines specific to customers needs to be addressed but then also under each customer centric guidelines there are thousands of complaints.

Consider RBI guidelines to change VISA/MC to RUPAY and banks get thousands of requests even from TF community which can't be handled by Single person but yes as you say officer means office under somebody then they can help to an extent but I still feel it will become useless once complaints floods to their offices in a much similar fashion like PNO don't tackle many complaints properly.

Plus a person from bank can never be loyal to RBI (that's what I feel) and RBI has to hunt the banks down anyone appointed by bank will be a façade.
 
Back
Top