📌 Bank’s claims to RBI:
- Transactions did not match my declared profile.
- I received multiple credits from different individuals.
- I declared my purpose as "personal use".
- I did not submit any documents about my profile.
- They asked me multiple times to close the account.
- Account was reviewed by RCU and closure was suggested.
📌 My 7-point reply to RBI (with clarification for each point):
1️⃣
Transaction mismatch – I submitted a detailed statement. 90%+ transactions were self-transfers and with family (brother, mother, sisters, in-laws). No unknown sources.
2️⃣
Timeline manipulation – I raised the unfreeze request on 10-02-2025 (not 01-03-2025 as they falsely claimed). I completed DigiLocker KYC and even visited the branch on 27-02-2025.
3️⃣
"Personal use" misquoted – I only mentioned “personal use” for a small set of minor transactions. Kotak wrongly applied it to all transactions.
4️⃣
Credits from others – All were family or known persons. I shared names and explanation for each credit.
5️⃣
Account closure pressure – I never requested closure. I always asked for unfreeze. They kept forcing closure without giving fair chance.
6️⃣
Suspicious activity – No specific transaction was ever flagged. The term “TXN PATTERN ANOMALY” was never explained clearly.
7️⃣
Document submission – I submitted my Office ID card and Breakdown of all transactions during the first unfreeze request. Kotak never officially asked for income proof or any other document in writing.
❌ Despite giving all proofs and clear response, RBI closed my case saying no further examination required. Very disappointing.
View attachment 95635View attachment 95634